ABERRANT CHURCH BEHAVIOUR TODAY

This is addressed to those who know better but do not have a ready explanation or answer when confronted by thriving aggressive extremism.

1 Samuel 9:6. ‘shall be turned into another man’- (or later ‘God gave him another heart’). This would not be a spiritual transformation, though it was God’s Spirit temporarily changing the involuntary behaviour of a proud and wilful man, turned from a simple cattle-herder into a prophet and later a king. God in rare instances chooses unholy vessels for His ejaculatory utterance. Similarly Balaam, the spiritist soothsayer recruited by Balak to curse Israel, involuntarily turned his occult spiritistic utterances into a blessing, including a remarkable Messianic prophecy. But both Old and New Testament writers describe his character as unrighteously opposed to God’s people and was later slain by the Israeli army.

Later in the Book of Samuel God restrains Saul from his murderous intent by allowing another spirit to expose his insanity by his prophetic-like ejaculatory utterances. This other spirit caused him to strip off his clothes lying naked all night in front of his men prophesying. This is an instance of Satan simulating the gift of God. This is particularly the case in our present-day of the apostate ‘falling away’ in Christendom, predicted by Christ during the latter days.

Note that today many unregenerate individuals ‘slain in the spirit’ are seeking spiritual phenomenon itself and thereby open themselves to an involuntary simulation of glossalia or other aberrant human behaviours they have observed to be the fashion of fervent worship. Involuntarily they lose control and fall down prostrate yielding to the subconscious desire to be like others: a spectacle.

This compares to jargon-aphasia in pagan occultist manifestations of animist and spiritist tribes. Even the two unconverted sons of thunder, James & John, when impulsively wanting to call down fire upon other unknown disciples were reproved: “Ýou know not what spirit you are of” (Luke 9:55).

Jessie Penn-Lewis went to visit the outbreak in Azusa Street, Los Angeles in 1906. Upon her return, she brought back to Wales her false fire of ‘glossalia’ as the sign and evidence of the Holy Spirit. Already condemned by Azusa’s Pastor Seymour, she wrote of her false demonology in ‘War on the Saints,’ and ‘Satan & his Kingdom’ and was a proponent in her writings of radical feminism.

Her emphasis on ‘glossalia’ and her influence on evangelist Evan Roberts as his confidante totally quenched the Welsh Revival and completely depressed Roberts until the day of his death as an isolated recluse.

Peter and the rest of the Eleven were converted when Jesus rose from the dead and appeared at Emmaus and Jerusalem opening their eyes to the Scriptures, lighting a fire within as they received the Spirit of God. (John 20. & Luke 24.) It is easy-religion’s convenient claim that the disciples were already Christians prior to that time, when in fact they were doubters with little or no faith without understanding the mission of Christ.
“When you are converted you will strengthen your brethren,” Jesus told Peter.

What is sadly becoming acceptable, in an increasing number of denominations, is part of the great deception of the last days. Azusa street phenomena, broadcasting Rev. Parham’s 1901 ‘unknown tongues’, appeared in 1904-6. on the heels of the highly popular spiritualist church movement of New York’s Fox sisters.

ABERRANT BEHAVIOR IN THE CHURCH

FALSE HOPE: BABBLING ECSTASY OF SAUL

Babbling unknown ecstatic glossalia was never sanctioned by Paul the apostle, even in the corrupt assembly at Corinth. It is not the gift but a simulation of understandable gift manifest at Pentecost, Caesarea, and Ephesus. 1 Corinthians 14 records not a precedent, but an exception now a delusion since the 1906 Los Angeles’ first Azusa Street Meeting. Even its Pastor, black blind Mr. Seymour said so. (Dictionary of Pentecostal & Charismatic Movements: Ed. Burgess, McGee, Alexander)

1 Samuel 9:2.
Saul’s attractiveness was his sturdy, tall, & unblemished appearance. Goodly did not intone godly character, for he was a self-willed, Narcissistic man from the beginning of his reign until his evil demise from dabbling with witchcraft for answers. His later change of heart and his prophetic utterances were no more than Balaam’s who also was a soothsayer God temporarily used for His purposes when in character he was an unusable mouthpiece. Saul’s momentary decision to accommodate Samuel’s orders was not heartfelt service to God, of which he and Balaam were incapable. Whether a mere equine ass or the wilful giant Saul, they were not beyond transient ecstatic utterance. God can choose to show his omnipotence enigmatically regardless of the vessel chosen.

FALSE HOPE: BABBLING ECSTASY OF SAUL

BIBLICAL GUIDE TO WORSHIP PRINCIPLES
Amos 5:23
Take away from me the noise of your songs; for I will not hear the melody of your viols.
James 4:4.
know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever, therefore, will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.
1 John 2:15-17.
15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.17 And the world passes away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abides forever.
Exodus 32.17-29 (excerpts)
17 And when Joshua heard THE NOISE OF THE PEOPLE …18 And he said,…THE NOISE OF THEM THAT SING DO I HEAR. …19 And … he saw the calf, AND THE DANCING: and Moses’ anger waxed hot, and he cast the tables out of his hands, and brake them beneath the mount. 26 Then Moses stood in the gate of the camp, and said, WHO IS ON THE LORD’S SIDE? let him come unto me. … 28 And there fell of the people that day about three thousand men.29 For Moses had said, Consecrate yourselves today to the Lord, even every man …that he may bestow upon you a blessing this day.

*All quotes from the King James Version (Public Domain)
JAMES & JOHN’S USE OF THE WORD: ‘’WORLD”.
1. The world is a word standing for the worldlings in the kingdom of darkness.
a. This means their songs, their lyrics, limericks, beat, and rhythm
b. This means their instruments not listed in Scripture
c. This means their loud needless amplification of same into the blast of excessive decibels.
d. This means their corrupt means of attracting and winning an audience
e. This means using entertainment dependent on worldly methods, not spiritual ones.
2. The music of the Hebrew worshippers had radically changed (see Amos 5.23 above).
a. Alignment with an idol changes everything in worship’s music and song:
b. The idols are instruments of the world, the dance rhythm/beat & emotion of worldlings;
c. The dress and undress (progressive immodesty) revealing by exposure or slovenliness.
d. Israel wanted to change worship because of doubt and distrust of traditional worship.
e. This change in music led to unseemly behaviour and sinfulness of their dance and nakedness.
f. The same Satanic delusion of Christian worship in a majority of churches causes the Spirit to be grieved and God departs to let the alternate deceiving spirits come in to simulate tee Spirit’s work and this started in the 1950s, continuing apace today using the world’s methods of attracting an audience with the same sensual rhythms used by sensual vocalists in the kingdom of darkness.
g. These churches rarely see even an awakening let alone conversions by illumination because God has left and man has taken over.
h. These churches (the increasing majority) in the ‘falling away’ of the last times (Matthew 24) rely on creation of excitement to unwittingly copy the inimitable atmosphere that the Holy Ghost brings in a small quiet voice (c. Elijah at Mt. Horeb escaping from Jezebel) 1 Kings 19:9-13
God is not loud, He works quietly in a reverent quiet congregation.
The average preacher and song leader seeks to awaken the interest of the audience so it will come back and support their unique sectarian movement, But only God can awaken and no man or minister can simulate. It will not be accomplished by instruments and songs using the rhythms and beats of the world.
Most new churches/missions/movements claiming to be unique fail to discern the invisible body of Christ by their sectarianism. Their uniqueness is quite frankly their misled humanism and pragmatism based on the 19th C fundamental emphasis of selecting special words/phrases or verses to be arbiters of truth to the neglect of the whole counsel of the whole Bible. It is tabooed private interpretation when this is done, making those words or passages superior to the rest of Scripture.
This allows each denomination to create its own hermeneutic or interpretative system of the Bible for its own biblical and doctrinal nuances, twisting the Word of God to its own destruction.
Thus following the humanist 18th C Age of Enlightenment the19th C pragmatist can twist the Scriptures to its own liking as it creates new unique doctrines. This had created over two thousand new breakaway splinter churches. 2 Peter 3:16.
Thus the 2,800 (Barratt 1977) separate church denominations, movements, and sects go each their own way and “every man did that which is right in his own eyes”- to the great detriment of the emaciated ‘body of Christ whose shepherding pastors will rarely feed the sheep (Ezekiel 13 & 34) as do not discern the body of Christ this eclipsed by their own misled uniqueness. For this reason, they are often sick and asleep (1 Corinthians 11) as their pulpits judgmentally advocate their sectarian bent instead of expounding Christ in the whole volume of the Book.
Western Christianity is fractious, judgmental, pragmatic, and thinks it has the right to freely use private interpretation of the Bible, tabooed by the apostles in Peter’s Epistle [ 2 Peter 1:20] and John in his Revelation [Revelation 22:18-19].
The result is that God the Father is very limited on how He can draw the lost to His Son, and He is obstructed by the false hopes of modern-day evangelists/ pastors who preach the gospel of affirmation, sacrament, decision, or tongues as evidence of the Spirit.
In their easy religion’s boast of numbers and statistics, they have in fact raised goats shown how to wear fleece instead of bringing lambs to birth. Assumptions of automated faith are at complete odds with the Scriptures.
Services are dominated by the bombastic stage performers with their flatteries and unctuous winsomeness. They act as gods and God often departs to leave the congregation in Ichabod.
God has called the preacher and missionary to preach Christ by expounding the Word of God through the foolishness of preaching without a private doctrinal agenda being foisted upon adulating pews.
Many get them to speak in unknown tongues never used on the day of Pentecost, rejected by the founder of modern-day Pentecostal at Azusa Street, Los Angeles 1906 as spiritism ending in witchcraft. Paul tabooed it for public assembly meetings. Unknown tongues (jargon aphasia of the pagans) was neither manifest at Caesarea, nor Ephesus or on the Day of Pentecost.
Only the corrupt drunken and gluttonous Corinthian church was it accepted until Paul banned it. 1 Corinthians 14.
I. Behold, the word of the Lord came to him, and he said unto him, What doest thou here, Elijah?…
II. and he said, Go forth, and stand upon the mount before the Lord…
III. and, behold, the Lord passed by, and a great and strong wind … but the Lord was not in the wind…
IV. and after the wind an earthquake; but the Lord was not in the earthquake…
V. and after the earthquake a fire; but the Lord was not in the fire…
VI. and after the fire a still small voice…
behold, there came a voice unto him, and said, What doest thou here, Elijah?

AWAKENED BELIEVER’S ENLIGHTENMENT.

THE AWAKENED BELIEVER.
1. Reading the Word of God produces moral convictions and these grow until discomforting the reader. Why? “that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.” (Romans 7:11)

2. The moral law and the condemnation it produces in man’s conscience, is meant to bring the believer to the end of himself and distrust his own efforts, and the false hopes of his own faith, and his own religious creed/ sacrament.

3. Man’s extremity is God’s opportunity for saving grace. The eleven disciples were in hiding, except John, after the crucifixion. They were at the end of themselves in mortifying sorrow facing their cowardice, disbelief, and failure.

4. This was the opportunity for the risen Christ to change their worldly sorrow into godly sorrow of repentance. Concomitantly the Lord Jesus converted their double-mindedness into genuine godly faith enabling them to believe as the day star of the Spirit indwelled them.

5. To have an enlightened mind is inadequate to understand the spiritual side of the Bible’s sixty six volumes. It is the most unusual book ever written and one needs something more than an enlightened mind of curiosity and rational reason to understand its message.

6. Though enlightenment produces zealous interest, curiosity, and understanding of the Bible’s characters, history, and moral directives it is unable to give spiritual discernment of Christ’s grace and redemption. Independent reason will prevent the natural mind from fathoming the saga of grace from Genesis to Revelation.

7. Enlightenment is secretly driven by the Father’s magnetic attraction of the believer to His Son in the Scriptures. Though mistaken today for the new birth, it falls far short of one possessing eternal life. He/she needs the illumination of Christ’s regenerating Spirit.

8. Awakening and enlightenment are all part of the Father drawing the believer to His Son. (John 6)

9. The faith of the believer is not enlightened only his mind and doubts of the ambivalent will remain. His own faith it wavers all the time. He needs the gift of true faith by grace. Until then he is like the first twelve disciples to whom Jesus questioned for their lack of faith.

BIBLE REFERENCES.
Preconditions to illumination (conversion).
1. John 6:44. No man can come to me, EXCEPT THE FATHER which hath sent me DRAW HIM:
2. John 6:37. All that the FATHER GIVES ME shall come to me…
3. John 6. 45. Every man therefore that has HEARD, AND HAS LEARNED of the Father, comes unto me.
4. Jeremiah 29:13. And you shall seek me, and find me, when you shall search for me with all your heart.

REPENTANCE 2 Corinthians 7: 8-10.
1. REPENTANCE is neither automatic nor worldly sorrow (being sorry for yourself). Sorrow of the world works death
2. WORLDLY sorrow is ‘but for a season’. The passing sorrow for one’s own consequences.
3. GODLY SORROW is the gift. You were made sorry after a godly manner. For godly sorrow works repentance to salvation

THE UNCONVERTED APOSTLES UNTIL HIS RESURRECTION.
1. Peter unconverted. Luke 22:32 .I have prayed for you that your faith fail not and when you are converted, strengthen your brethren.
2. Conversion by the washing of the blood purges the conscience. Hebrews 9:14. (Hebrews 10:22)
3. Natural faith cannot bring salvation. James 1:6-7. Natural faith is fickle.
4. Conversion by illumination comes alone by preaching, not water, wine or wafer.
a. 1 Corinthians 1:21. it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

** All scripture quoted from the KJV or King James Version (Public Domain).

AWAKENED BELIEVER’S ENLIGHTENMENT.

Abstinence part of Separation. (James 4.4)

Daniel 1:15. Cp. Abstinence of regenerated (illuminated) believers in James 4:4 in the New Testament. The common characteristic of true children of God from Abram onwards (Genesis 13: 5-9). Abram however, first had to get away from his Egyptian compromise and dishonesty before he could return to Bethel’s altar where he had been from the beginning. Then he called again on the Lord and could boldly take a stand for separation and pay the personal cost of holiness and usefulness. Afterwards the rewards were greater than all the losses: he was blessed with Christ’s grace (Melchizedech) [Genesis.14] then with faith & justification [Gen.15] then adopted by God the Father. [Genesis.17].

Abstinence part of Separation. (James 4.4)

FOUR STAGES OF THE BELIEVER’S FAITH. (Part 1)

PART ONE: THE UNAWAKENED BELIEVER.
It is not enough to believe, but there are many believers in the church who have not been awakened. They have never had an encounter with the living Christ’s spirit because they have never sought him with all of their heart. They were happy to have a quick-fix that the church has offered the world since the 19th C. There are varying degrees of belief towards Jesus in the Gospels of the N.T.
Many religious have never heard the call of Christ. They may read the Scriptures and attend Christian worship services. One day listening to the Bible based preacher there comes a personal response of the believer. He/she is suddenly arrested by the challenge to follow Christ and do His bidding. His whole being is awakened into the reality of Christ’s presence and he/she becomes an ardent follower or disciple.
Unawakened souls are not disciples of Christ, merely religious. They may be in the church, but they do not have God’s presence WITH THEM and are not yet His SHEEP.
The unawakened believer has no knowledge of the Scriptures and finds the Bible a mystery which he does not understand.
The unawakened person is classed as a walking dead, or ‘dead man walking’. The unawakened believer needs not to procrastinate too long or the day of grace may pass too soon.
The unawakened person may well have knowledge of creed, confession, and written articles of faith, such as baptism washes away sins.
Awakening does not happen at one’s own behest or the will of the preacher. It is at God’s behest alone. No decision, prayer, water, wine or wafer can compel God to awaken the lost soul, dead in sins and trespasses. The four stages of belief in the New Testament are the unawakened, the awakened, the enlightened, and the illuminated believer.

BIBLE REFERENCES.
John 6:44. No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him:
John 6:65 … no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
John 10:16. And other SHEEP I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice.
1 Corinthians 15:34. AWAKE to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of God: I speak this to your shame.
Ephesians 5:14… AWAKE you that sleep, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give you light.
Romans 13:11. …it is high time to AWAKE out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed.
James 2:19. …the devils also believe and tremble.

FOUR STAGES OF THE BELIEVER’S FAITH. (Part 1)

Your Trust in Water or Blood?

IS YOUR TRUST IN WATER OR THE BLOOD?
1. So were you baptized to follow the kingdom example of Christ?
a) Did you know that He as a conforming Jew was baptized before He began the kingdom of heaven and that as the ‘Son of David’ in the Messianic lineage of his forbears that he needed to honour and fulfill all the promises of the patriarchs, the prophets and the Psalms of David?
b) He needed to ‘fulfill all things’ as John the Baptist was at first reluctant to baptize him because John himself insisted that he had not been baptized.
c) Did you know that Jesus declined to baptize John, the last prophet of the first testament era: Law and Prophets of which the Lord called John the greatest?
d) To fulfill the promises of the first testament of blood predicting a new High Priest would arise from the tribe of Judah
• Mark’s differing place of ascension- not Olivet-unnamed-
• Baptismal commission yet LJC neve baptized-only the twelve
• No place in the4 gospels where LJC baptized in water-not once-despite dispelled rumour in John 3 &4
• John 3-4 was started by a rumour and hearsay notwithstanding John 4:1-2 reiterated claim that the twelve baptized which has never been corroborated in the Gospels-even once.
• John B prophesiedthat Jesus would baptize others bin fire nopt water.
• The true commission from Jerusalem’s ascension mount of Olivet (Mt of Olives) reported in Acts 1 was not a baptismal commission but one that preempted the baptism of fire 50 days later at Jerusalem on the day of the feast f Pentecost.
• It is commonly known among a wide cross section of theologians (even evangelicals of the right,that the last part of Mark 16 (v9-20) was lost and replaced by another ending. Thus it is thought generally to be an unreliable section of the Word for doctrine and practice not withstanding the radical fundamentalist who may well be a pragmatic bibliolater.
• Many have advocated since the 19th C age of doctrinal pragmatism that the NT teaches baptismal regeneration like the church of Rome

REFORMATION’S NEW TESTAMENT FROM ORIGINAL GREEK.

REFORMATION’S NEW TESTAMENT FROM ORIGINAL GREEK.

Reformation’s Published New Testament from Original Greek.
(*Marked editions were the six Reformation New Testaments.)
1. 1400 Islam invades Constantinople (today’s Istanbul) forcing Greek scholars to flee into Europe with their invaluable Greek manuscripts of the New Testament.
2. 1439 Gutenberg invents the printing press.
3. 1450 The printing of Europe’s first book: the Latin Bible of Rome in polyglot format.
4. 1516 The Renaissance Dutch scholar Erasmus prints the Greek New Testament.
5. 1517 Martin Luther begins the Reformation at the University of Wittenberg.
6. 1522: Luther publishes the New Testament in German from Erasmus Greek NT
7. *1526: William Tyndale publishes the first English edition using Erasmus Greek NT
8. 1527: The pope burns and bans Tyndale’s English New Testament (NT)
9. *1535: The Crown (UK) unwittingly publishes Miles Coverdale Bible, (Tyndale NT).
10. *1537: The Crown (UK) unwittingly again prints the tabooed Tyndale N.T. of John Rogers under the pseudonym: Thomas Matthew’s Bible, (includes nine OT books).
11. *1539, The Crown (UK) prints The Great Bible, a Miles Coverdale revised edition of the Thomas Matthew Bible (Tyndale NT reprinted).
12. Changed English monarch (RC) forces Puritan scholars, translators, & publishers to flee to Geneva (Switzerland) as a refuge and safe harbour.
13. *1560, Geneva Bible published. Widely used by Shakespeare & American colonies.
14. *1611: King James Bible, the sixth and last Bible of the Reformation using the Greek New Testament of Erasmus.

The English Inquisition saw arrests, torture, imprisonment, and execution of those who dared defy the conflicting powers of Canterbury (Roman), the monarchy, the Holy Roman Empire’s pontiff in Germany, and the pontiff in Rome itself. Even Henry 8th at first pro-Protestant, later banned reading or possessing the Tyndale NT of 1526 and 1534.

As Tyndale was burning on the stake in 1536 he was also strangled to stifle his stentorian prayer’s voice: “That the eyes of the king (UK) be opened.” Within the year came the miraculous Crown publications of the very same contraband New Testament of Tyndale in various formats, under Puritans like Coverdale and Rogers. His prayer had been speedily answered and its impact changed the English speaking world’s culture on both sides of the Atlantic.

The humanist 18th C Age of Enlightenment led to the 19th C replacement of the Erasmus Greek New Testament by Westcott & Hort, the basis for all the so-called new and better translations of the Bible unleashing the covert denigration of the Scriptures’ final authority present today.

Originating in German rationalism it hatched liberal modernism and Higher Bible Criticism. Each of these unholy branches of academia conveniently rejected Reformation scholars, translators, and publishers. In so doing it invented its own hermeneutic of private interpretation, condemned by the New Testament.

This ejection of the Byzantine tradition included the Elzevir Brothers’ Received Text published by Stephanus, (Robert Etienne) the well known French publisher. He also versified the English New Testament of Tyndale to make its twenty-seven books more readable. All of such work was due to the monolithic translating work of Erasmus in 1516, rendering the New Testament for the first time in its original language.

One main influence in the vacuum created by the false scholarship of the 18th C was the re-elevation of the ancient Vatican manuscript: Codex Vaticanus. The second significant portentous change under Roman and pro-Roman liberal scholars of the 19th C was the highlighting of another non-Byzantine manuscript: the Codex Sinaiticus.

It was discovered at Mt. Sinai monastery by Count von Tischendorf in the 1840s. He opined that both Codices were scribed by the same hand around the same period as Emperor Constantine, who founded the Church of Rome. The new emperor with the recruited team of Bishop Eusebius re-translated the 3rd C Old Latin NT and ordered his team to scribe fifty new Latin Bibles from it. Reformed and Puritan scholars later purged five of the added seven sacraments of Constantine in deference to the Greek New Testament’s originality.

Rome’s Counter-Reformation continued denigration of Reformation scholarship against the Erasmus Greek New Testament was the undercurrent, not always visible to the naked eye of the politically correct wings of Christendom today.
THE CONTINUING COUNTER-REFORMATION OF 16th & 17th C VIA ACADEMIA.
• 1568, Bishops Bible more for Roman Catholics, not liked by Queen Elizabeth.
• 1582: Douai-Reims New Testament for Catholics: against Protestants
• 1609-10: Douai-Reims Old Testament for Catholics: against Protestants

REFORMATION’S NEW TESTAMENT FROM ORIGINAL GREEK.

PRESERVING BIBLE STUDY DISCUSSION HARMONY

ENSURING CONTINUED HARMONY OF GROUP STUDIES by John David
Here are a few Scriptures describing the danger that all growth group meetings face when one outspoken person begins to espouse and teach his/her own ideas in a forceful, opinionated manner.
A. Disharmony can thus be generated when that person begins violating the given code of courteous order;
B. He introduces a dogmatic argumentative tone;
C. This is particularly so when he unrelentingly maintains his position
D. Thus his repetitive, interruptive manner demanding the group concede his point can waylay the normal dynamics of a healthy group examination of the Scriptures
E. If not gently checked by the leader with a measure of firmness his persistence will prevent a return to the prevailing dynamic of harmonious group exchange led by the leader’s scrutiny of the chosen biblical passage in question.

The advice of Paul the apostle affirms these dangers and the consequences of allowing such to occur for the sake of free speech.
1 Timothy 1:5-6. …turned aside unto vain jangling … understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.
2 Timothy 3:7. Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
Colossians 2:8. Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men…
1 Corinthians 3:19. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God…
2 Corinthians 1:12. …in simplicity and godly sincerity, not with fleshly wisdom …
2 Corinthians 2:17. For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.
2 Timothy 2:14-16 …strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers…rightly dividing the word of truth…but shun profane and vain babblings.
1 Corinthians 2:13. … not in the words which man’s wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Ghost teaches; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
2 Corinthians 10:12. …: but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise.
2 Peter 1:20. Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.

Quoted verses from the King James Version (Public domain)
Article by John David of Bible Simply

PRESERVING BIBLE STUDY DISCUSSION HARMONY

1st BOOK OF SAMUEL (1)

PREFACE TO THE BOOK OF 1ST SAMUEL.
For a more comprehensive understanding of the background to this fourth book of biblical Israeli history, the reader should first read the Epilogue review of the preceding three books at the end of this article. It is paramount that the sequence of the chronological saga be grasped by the reader to understand the divine sovereign election of:-

1. Abram the father of faith;
2. The lineage of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Israel)
3. The saga of Israel after the Exodus
4. The vicissitudes of success and failure by Joshua settling the Promised Land
5. The repetitive cycle of deviance by God’s chosen people responding to their patriarchs, prophets, priests, judges, and kings;
6. The propensity of each succeeding generation to more grave godlessness, despite the divine system of Israel’s theocracy, or monarchy centred around the tabernacle/temple worship of God’s manifest presence;
7. God’s covenant, then later breach of covenant, with Israel and His afflictive chastisement on its people for its apostasy, rebellion, and idolatry;
8. God’s wrathful vengeance upon Israelite impenitence tempered by God’s merciful overtures;
9. God’s irrevocable promises, of which He was oft reminded by the godly prophet, priest or king who dared intercede or mediate on their people’s behalf;
10. God’s final limit of mercy upon the Land of Promise, David’s tribe, and Jerusalem’s eternal city of David. As if the reign of Ahaz wasn’t bad enough, King Manasseh crossed the red line and the fate of Judah became that of the earlier elimination of Israel in Samaria besieged by Assyria over a hundred years before Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem and its hinterland of Judah;
11. God’s dispersing the Jews of the scattered Diaspora as testimony to His wrath upon them for their marring the Land He had given them;
12. God’s everlasting promise that when everything else had failed He would send a Saviour to stand in the gap to rescue His people and those outside the ‘wall of partition’ under the legacy of Abraham: the Gentiles. Thus in the books of history, the Psalms and the Prophets the unabated divine overtures of promise and mercy intermittently continued. In the thirty-nine books of Old Testament sacred canon this gave His people one remaining hope of return, restoration, and salvation. This was catalogued by:
a. The election of David as ‘a man after God’s own heart;’
b. God’s tryst and covenant with David to eternally preserve, his tribe of Judah and Jerusalem with its temple which had superseded the tabernacle in Solomon’s time;
c. The irrevocability of God’s promise to David, despite:-
i. The splitting of the kingdom into Israel in Samaria and Judah in Jerusalem;
ii. Assyria’s siege of Samaria and the imprisonment, abduction, and deportation of Jewish citizenry,
iii. Similarly, one hundred and twenty years later, the Chaldean captivity of Judah wherein the city of Jerusalem was razed to the ground, a burning heap.

For background, readers can review the previous books of Joshua, Judges and Ruth.

PROLOGUE TO THE BOOK OF 1ST SAMUEL.
CHARACTERS: (not including Saul)
1. ELI
the priest who is described by the text as apostate and cold like so many of the clergy today in the church:-
a. He misunderstood the travail of true prayer and treated the saint suspiciously as an aberration or non-conformist among the status quo.
b. He ostracizes Hannah and condemns her for her burden of prayer because it is beyond his life’s experience. This too is typical of the modern preacher who would write such as charismatic psychosis.
c. Eli was highly judgmental of any resurgence of new life in the congregation, in which he had wounded the sheep or driven them away (Ezekiel 13 & 34).
d. Eli was compromisingly ‘blind’ to his sons’ grievous infidelity and protected them and himself from the embarrassment of exposure.
e. Eli protected his family name, rather than the name of the Lord God Almighty, and was more an obstacle to worship than a help.
f. Eli had access to the testament and testimony of God’s Word, within the Ark, but he kept it hidden from the people and there was no ‘open vision’ because, by his indolence, the Word of God was precious but scarce.
g. Eli was more concerned about perpetuating the family name than the testimony of God’s Word;
h. Eli set up his own dynasty based on tradition instead of seeking God’s sovereign will.
2. ELKANAH
a. He was a dedicated god-fearing Jew from the tribe of Ephraim, a descendant of the tribe of Joseph, who spared no expense for his family to be faithful to the annual gathering at Shiloh, wherein lay the tent of the tabernacle (called ‘temple’ in the text).
b. He took notice of his wife’s sacrificial tendencies and yielded to them, though he himself was equally committed to the tenet of Matthew 6: 33.
3. HANNAH.
a. Though barren, she dared to believe for the impossible conception of a son, whom, when born would be loaned to the Lord at the Tabernacle, despite the priesthood’s wayward ways.
b. Hannah was consumed with a passion for the will of the Spirit in the dark days that ensued the anarchy of the Judges.
c. Hannah wholeheartedly loved the Lord with her mind, soul, strength and might and she contritely trembled at God’s Word as precious despite it being in common neglect.
d. She was burdened to ‘strengthen that which remained,’ rather than censoriously advocate reformation or a boycott of the Tabernacle. (Revelation 3:2a) This too has application to today’s congregations suffering from the predicted ‘falling away’.
e. She was neither pragmatically judgmental, nor a feministic protestor, but subservient to her husband and her minister, while at the same time resigned to prioritize the Lord’s will at His behest.
f. She was a woman of God.
4. SAMUEL THE PROPHET-PRIEST
appeared concurrently at the time of the Spirit’s awakening and restoration of a broken theocracy.
a. Though very young he had been taught to ‘worship God in spirit and truth’ before he arrived to serve Eli in Shiloh.
b. Like Joshua, Moses’ servant, Samuel would spend much time in the Tabernacle.
c. In adulthood, Samuel moved in a circuit as a judge, priest, and prophet until his old age.
d. Sadly, in his senior years, he began to compromise. Unlike the preceding period of Judges in which the Holy Spirit raised up the successor to judge Israel, Samuel set up a dynasty appointing his two sons: Joel and Abiah judges.
e. As both sons succumbed to offers of bribery their priestly office became debased and untenable.
f. This had been preceded by the earlier loss of the Ark to the Philistines.
g. But, whether Tabernacle or church, when an assembly reaches the stage of being ‘Ichabod’, God forsakes it, as the Psalmist would later describe Shiloh. (Psalm 78:60) Whereas the Tabernacle had been at Shiloh for 400 years.
h. Nonetheless, the aged Samuel fell into the same trap as Eli and inadvertently followed his precedent by appointing his own sons to continue his legacy.
i. It was this misjudgment that led to the end of the theocracy and made the people clamour for a monarchy instead.
j. Once Saul was anointed as the first king Samuel went to Gilgal, not Shiloh, to renew the kingdom. This was nearby to the Jordan, and Jericho and had been Joshua’s first encampment after crossing the flooded Jordan River. It had been the place where the manna ceased and the Exodus minors were circumcised.
k. Samuel was devastated that Israel had rejected the theocracy and this was compounded by the failure of Saul to act within the boundaries of his remit as a king and was soon marked as God’s reject for his stubbornness and impetuous disobedience, refusing to submit to Samuel or God.

TO BE CONTINUED: Part 2.

1st BOOK OF SAMUEL (1)